Talk:Algebraic chess notation

Somewhere we should treat the other notation elements someone is likely to encounter when reading about chess:

E.g. from http://misc.traveller.com/chess/beginner/notation/notation.html

• = both sides are considered equal here
• +/= white is slightly better
• =/+ black is slightly better
• +/- white has a clear advantage
• -/+ black has a clear advantage
• 1-0 white won
• 0-1 black won
• .5-.5 draw
• 1/2-1/2 draw
• ! an excellent move
• ? a blunder
• !? an interesting move that may not be best
• ?! a dubious move, but not easily refuted

It isn't clear that the algebraic notation page is the right place. Jeff 18:56 Nov 4, 2002 (UTC)

Is castling written with the letter O or the number 0?--Sonjaaa 11:31, Sep 9, 2004 (UTC)

It's the number. At least, that's what I've always assumed, and it's what the FIDE Handbook uses in its description of algebraic notation. --Zundark 12:16, 9 Sep 2004 (UTC)

Should there also be mention of the notation Informator uses, which is algebraic, but with piece symbols instead of letter?--Gangster Octopus 23:07, 15 Apr 2005 (UTC)