Talk:Blunder

Perhaps move the chess discription later to a seperate page and list famous chess blunders like Karpov against Kasparov

Historical judgements

I doubt these examples can be considered NPOV. - Montréalais 01:47 Apr 25, 2003 (UTC)

I added some weasel words. How's that? Spalding 16:20, Oct 10, 2004 (UTC)

Oops, I see that's not good: Wikipedia:Avoid_weasel_terms. But until someone figures out a better way, I'll leave it for now. Spalding 16:23, Oct 10, 2004 (UTC)

I agree that this page looks POV to me. The list of blunders does. Some of the history of the word might be interesting, though I'm not sure whether that isn't a dictionary definition. "Wikipedians are invited to" is not thing that belongs in a wikipedia article either. Martijn faassen 10:27, 17 Jul 2004 (UTC)

This random collection adds nothing to the article and I have removed it. I have reproduced here so that it can be put back if anyone strongly disagrees. A full list of events that "may be considered to be blunders" would run to pages and page. I don't understand why the following merit particular mention.

Examples of things that may be considered to be blunders include:

• Specific actions, like the Tea Act of 1773, in British policy toward the American colonies before the American Revolutionary War
• Decision making prior to World War I
• Mussolini's decision to ally with Hitler and subsequently to invade Greece
• The Japanese attack against Pearl Harbor
• U.S. policy during the Vietnam War

--Etimbo | Talk 14:00, 11 Apr 2005 (UTC)