User:EntmootsOfTrolls

This user has been hard banned -- see User:EntmootsOfTrolls/ban for details. All subsequent edits by this user may be reverted. Please do not reinstate any edits made by this user. 24 September 2003

(Talk to User talk:EntmootsOfTrolls/ban)

See also User:142, User:24

Hoom. Hum. Nothing to say here. Hah. No. Nothing. Sorry. Sorry also to be so hasty.

The neutrality of this page is disputed. As it should be.

Hey,EofT glad to see someone is interested in my ways and doings over in the ed world. It's been awhile since I last dove into Wikipedia and I appreciate your tips and suggestions! Right now, I'm studying for a test and so kind of use the wikipedia to round out my encyclopedic knowledge as I focus on certain articles... does that make sense? thanks again for your comments! --DennisDaniels

Some knots containing an ongoing NPOV dispute on important subjects - what are the main views on the relations between these issues? Are they clustered into religious, political, or philosophical movements, or theories?

Some jokers in the deck that can probably ultimately be resolved, and are complicated mostly by pro-tech, pro-communication, pro-knowledge bias here:

• Truth, political media, Persuasion technology, Propositional knowledge, instructional capital, trust
• Assured destruction, Biodefense, Biosafety protocol, Genetic engineering, safe trade, natural capital, genetic modification, molecular engineering

The JACK of SNOT:

• Money, Debt, Interest, Wealth, Poverty, human capital

The QUEEN of SNOT:

• economic growth, Capitalism, Anarcho-capitalism, Anti-globalization movement, World economy, political economy, law and economics, uneconomic growth, nature's services

And the reigning KING OF SNOT:

• Moral core, Property damage, property rights, rights, violence, Political philosophy, political science, politics, Philosophy, Religion, Law, legal code, Ethics, applied ethics, ethical code, Aretaic turn, theory of value, value of life, value of Earth, moral code, simple view of ethics and morals

Who unravels thiSNOT, must become Wikipedia:King_of_Wikipedia!

My view: Earth > ecology > economics > ethics > environment > Elvis

We must rename the Wikipedia list of Earth topics comprehensible to humans

"My guess for 'quantify ethical anm outcomes' in that context is 'quantify ethical and moral outcomes'. Does that seem right? I would fix it but I am seeing the 'can't contact database server' message, and getting only a cache copy."

"and moral"? That sounds like a plausible interpretation. Frankly, I couldn't figure out what in the world that "anm" thing stood for. --Wiwaxia

Please see